Abstract
This HIPAA-compliant study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was not required. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively compare room use time for interventional procedures performed with multiple-image multi-detector row computed tomographic (CT) fluoroscopy (n=196) and single-image spiral CT fluoroscopy (n=175). There was no statistically significant difference in age, sex, or procedural type between the two groups. The median room use time was 90 minutes (interquartile range, 65-120 minutes) for the single-image technique and 75 minutes (interquartile range, 60-105 minutes) for the multiple-image technique. A two-sample t test with equal variance assumption on the log-transformed data showed a statistically significant difference in log time (P<.001) between the two groups. This time savings could potentially have a substantial clinical effect on resource use and patient throughput.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
