Abstract
Multiple fibroepitheliomas of Pinkus after radiotherapy
Highlights
SIH has been considered a more effective method of repairing when compared to FTSG, it requires a longer healing time.[2,4] It is indicated for areas more susceptible to pressure since the local inherent trauma of these sites tends to impair the viability of grafts and flaps.[4]
Jung et al.[2] demonstrated that patients in the SIH group showed better results than patients submitted to skin graft repair when considering the occurrence of infections, seroma, and necrosis.[2]
We presented two examples of possible surgical approaches for AM management, showing that, despite its longer recovery, SIH produces excellent cosmetic and functional results,[2] with minimal morbidity and lower complication rates.[1]
Summary
SIH has been considered a more effective method of repairing when compared to FTSG, it requires a longer healing time.[2,4] It is indicated for areas more susceptible to pressure since the local inherent trauma of these sites tends to impair the viability of grafts and flaps.[4]. José Antônio Jabur da Cunha: Approval of the final version of the manuscript; conception and planning of the study; obtaining, analyzing and interpreting the data; effective participation in research orientation; intellectual participation in propaedeutic and/or therapeutic conduct of the cases studied; critical review of the manuscript.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have