Abstract

BackgroundAcute trauma pain is poorly managed in the emergency department (ED). The reasons are partly organizational: ED crowding and rare trauma care pathways contribute to oligoanalgesia. Anticipating the organizational impact of an innovative care procedure might facilitate the decision-making process and help to optimize pain management.MethodsWe used a multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach to consider the organizational impact of methoxyflurane (self-administered) in the ED, introduced alone or supported by a trauma care pathway. A MCDA experiment was designed for this specific context, 8 experts in emergency trauma care pathways (leading physicians and pharmacists working in French urban tertiary hospitals) were recruited. The study involved four steps: (i) Selection of organizational criteria for evaluating the innovation’s impact; (ii) assessment of the relative weight of each criterion; (iii) choice of appropriate scenarios for exploring the organizational impact of MEOX under various contexts; and (iv) software-assisted simulation based on pairwise comparisons of the scenarios. The final outcome measure was the expected overall organizational impact of methoxyflurane on a 0-to-100 scale (score >50: positive impact).ResultsNine organizational criteria were selected. "Mean length of stay in the ED" was the most weighted. Methoxyflurane alone obtained 59 as a total score, with a putative positive impact for eight criteria, and a neutral effect on one. When a trauma care pathway was introduced concomitantly, the impact of methoxyflurane was greater overall (score: 75) and for each individual criterion.ConclusionsOur model highlighted the putative positive organizational impact of methoxyflurane in the ED—particularly when supported by a trauma care pathway—and the relevance of expert consensus in this particular pharmacoeconomic context. The MCDA approach could be extended to other research fields and healthcare challenges in emergency medicine.

Highlights

  • In the emergency department (ED), acute trauma pain is not always managed optimally [1]

  • A multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) experiment was designed for this specific context, 8 experts in emergency trauma care pathways were recruited

  • The MCDA approach could be extended to other research fields and healthcare challenges in emergency medicine

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the emergency department (ED), acute trauma pain is not always managed optimally [1]. The causes of this failure (referred to as oligoanalgesia) are well known; the primary reason is ED crowding, which is accentuated by poor organization in treatment zones [2,3,4]. The implementation of integrated care pathways (as a form of guideline-based care) is an organizational response to changes in patient flows, and is recommended in the current guidelines [7]. Acute trauma pain is poorly managed in the emergency department (ED). Anticipating the organizational impact of an innovative care procedure might facilitate the decision-making process and help to optimize pain management

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call