Abstract

Previous research has failed to produce an appropriate framework for evaluating the effectiveness of public personnel departments. The lack of such a framework impedes the quality of decision making by personnel practitioners and of research by academicians. An appropriate framework should take into account the competing demands of the groups served by and able to influence public personnel departments. This article presents the Multiple Constituencies Activities and Standards Framework (MCAS), which has been applied in North Carolina counties. MCAS provides evaluations by various groups (constituents) of the activities of their personnel departments, and compares those evaluations to ratings achieved by other personnel departments over time.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.