Abstract

PurposeIn spite of the effectiveness of opioid antagonist treatment (OAT) in reducing injecting drug use and needle sharing, programmes in prison continue to be largely stigmatised. This affects programme participation and the quality of programmes delivered. This study aims to explore how Indonesian prison staff and prisoners perceived and experienced stigma relating to prison OAT programmes and identify potential strategies to alleviate this stigma.Design/methodology/approachThree prisons in Indonesia were selected as part of a qualitative case study. Two of the prisons provided OAT, in the form of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit study participants. In total, 57 semi-structured interviews were conducted with prison governors, health-care staff, prison officers and prisoners. Prisoners included both participants and non-participants in methadone programmes. The data were analysed thematically.FindingsMMT programme participants were perceived by both prison staff and other prisoners to be engaged in illicit drug use, and as lazy, poor, dirty and unproductive people. They were also presumed to be HIV-positive. These multi-layered, intersectional sources of (inter-personal) stigma amplified the effects on prisoners affecting not only their quality of life and mental health but also their access to prison parole programmes, and therefore the possibility of early release. In addition, organisational factors – notably non-confidential programme delivery and lack of both family and institutional supports for methadone prisoners – exacerbated the stigmatisation of MMT programme participants.Practical implicationsEffective strategies to alleviate stigma surrounding OAT programmes such as MMT programmes are urgently needed to ensure participation in and the quality of programmes in prisons.Originality/valueMany prisoners reported experiencing stigma relating to their participation in MMT programmes in both the methadone prisons studied. They often emphasised the ways that this stigmatisation was amplified by the ways that MMT programme participation was associated with drug use and HIV infection. However, these intersecting experiences and concerns were not recognised by health-care staff or other prison staff. Effective strategies to alleviate stigma surrounding OAT programmes such as MMT programmes are urgently needed to ensure participation in and the quality of programmes in prisons.

Highlights

  • Introduction ernIntAfter South Africa, Southeast Asian countries have the second highest burden of HIV infection globally with around 5.8 million people living with HIV (PLWH) in 2019(Avert 2020)

  • Stigma towards maintenance treatment (MMT) programme participants is driven by generalised negative ern

  • Organisational factors that reinforced the stigmatisation relating to MMT programmes ranged from a lack of confidentiality in delivering the programmes to the absence of family and institutional support

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Twenty percent of this total (WHO 2016) live in Indonesia, an archipelago and Muslim-majority nation, where there are concentrated epidemics in on ati key populations including among people who inject drugs (PWID) UNAIDS (2019) reported an HIV prevalence figure of 28.8% for PWID in Indonesia. Despite these figures, only 13% of PLWH in the country receive treatment (UNAIDS 2017). According to the Directorate of Corrections (2017), 224,032 people are imprisoned in ur Indonesia, 40% of whom (90,606 people) are drug-offending prisoners. Of these na are known to be HIV-positive.

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call