Abstract

A nine-octapeptide insertion in the prion protein (PrP) gene is associated with an inherited form of human prion disease. Transgenic (Tg) mice that express the mouse homolog of this mutation (designated PG14) spontaneously accumulate in their brains an insoluble and weakly protease-resistant form of the mutant protein. This form (designated PG14(Spon)) is highly neurotoxic, but is not infectious in animal bioassays. In contrast, when Tg(PG14) mice are inoculated with the Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) strain of prions, they accumulate a different form of PG14 PrP (designated PG14(RML)) that is highly protease resistant and infectious in animal transmission experiments. We have been interested in characterizing the molecular properties of PG14(Spon) and PG14(RML), with a view to identifying features that determine two, apparently distinct properties of PrP aggregates: their infectivity and their pathogenicity. In this paper, we have subjected PG14(Spon) and PG14(RML) to a panel of assays commonly used to distinguish infectious PrP (PrP(Sc)) from cellular PrP (PrP(C)), including immobilized metal affinity chromatography, precipitation with sodium phosphotungstate, and immunoprecipitation with PrP(C)- and PrP(Sc)-specific antibodies. Surprisingly, we found that aggregates of PG14(Spon) and PG14(RML) behave identically to each other, and to authentic PrP(Sc), in each of these biochemical assays. PG14(Spon) however, in contrast to PG14(RML) and PrP(Sc), was unable to seed the misfolding of PrP(C) in an in vitro protein misfolding cyclic amplification reaction. Collectively, these results suggest that infectious and non-infectious aggregates of PrP share common structural features accounting for their toxicity, and that self-propagation of PrP involves more subtle molecular differences.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call