Abstract

BackgroundAdvantages of multiple arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been reported previously. We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of multiple arterial CABG (MABG) among patients with mild to moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD).MethodsThis multicenter study using propensity score matching took place from January 2013 to June 2019 in Jiangsu Province and Shanghai, China, with a mean and maximum follow-up of 3.3 and 6.8 years, respectively. We included patients with mild to moderate LVSD, undergoing primary, isolated multi-vessel CABG with left internal thoracic artery. The in-hospital and mid-term outcomes of MABG versus conventional left internal thoracic artery supplemented by saphenous vein grafts (single arterial CABG) were compared. The primary end points were death from all causes and death from cardiovascular causes. The secondary end points were stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and a composite of all mentioned outcomes, including death from all causes (major adverse events). Sternal wound infection was included with 6 months of follow-up after surgery.Results243 and 676 patients were formed in MABG and single arterial CABG cohorts after matching in a 1:3 ratio. In-hospital death was not significantly different (MABG 1.6% versus single arterial CABG 2.2%, p = 0.78). After a mean (±SD) follow-up time of 3.3 ± 1.8 years, MABG was associated with lower rates of major adverse events (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44–0.94; p = 0.019), myocardial infarction (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.16–0.99; p = 0.045) and repeat revascularization (HR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18–0.97; p = 0.034). There was no difference in the rates of death, stroke, and sternal wound infection.ConclusionsMABG was associated with reduced mid-term rates of major adverse events and cardiovascular events and may be the procedure of choice for patients with mild to moderate LVSD requiring CABG.

Highlights

  • Despite advances in multiple therapeutic strategies, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is still associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients suffering from coronary artery disease [1]

  • Patients treated with multiple arterial CABG (MABG) were younger, with a higher index of estimated glomerular filtration rate, and had lower proportions of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and previous myocardial infarction (MI)

  • Our data were highly complete with only smoker and cerebrovascular accident of covariates having less than 0.5% missing data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Despite advances in multiple therapeutic strategies, left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is still associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients suffering from coronary artery disease [1]. Several observational studies and the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial have consistently reported the potential advantages of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in prolonging survival and reducing cardiovascular events among patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function [2,3,4,5]. Arterial conduits have superior patency rates and have been associated with a better prognosis in surgical revascularization It would be argued whether impaired LV function could recover from this superiority, regarding patients with LVSD. We aimed to evaluate the mid-term outcomes of multiple arterial CABG (MABG) among patients with mild to moderate left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call