Abstract
Despite considerable efforts, the properties that drive the cytotoxicity of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) remain poorly understood. Here, the authors inverstigate a panel of 31 ENMs with different core chemistries and a variety of surface modifications using conventional in vitro assays coupled with omics‐based approaches. Cytotoxicity screening and multiplex‐based cytokine profiling reveals a good concordance between primary human monocyte‐derived macrophages and the human monocyte‐like cell line THP‐1. Proteomics analysis following a low‐dose exposure of cells suggests a nonspecific stress response to ENMs, while microarray‐based profiling reveals significant changes in gene expression as a function of both surface modification and core chemistry. Pathway analysis highlights that the ENMs with cationic surfaces that are shown to elicit cytotoxicity downregulated DNA replication and cell cycle responses, while inflammatory responses are upregulated. These findings are validated using cell‐based assays. Notably, certain small, PEGylated ENMs are found to be noncytotoxic yet they induce transcriptional responses reminiscent of viruses. In sum, using a multiparametric approach, it is shown that surface chemistry is a key determinant of cellular responses to ENMs. The data also reveal that cytotoxicity, determined by conventional in vitro assays, does not necessarily correlate with transcriptional effects of ENMs.
Highlights
Considerable progress has been made in recent years with respect to hazard assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), and advanced methods including high-throughput and high-content screening platforms as well as omics-based approaches are gaining traction.[1]
To explore the relevance of the observed gene expression changes, we focused our attention on the six metal ENMs that displayed the most pronounced effects and performed gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses.[25]
We performed a multiparametric evaluation of a large panel of ENMs using human in vitro models representing the immune system.[31]
Summary
Considerable progress has been made in recent years with respect to hazard assessment of engineered nanomaterials (ENMs), and advanced methods including high-throughput and high-content screening platforms as well as omics-based approaches are gaining traction.[1]. Validation experiments were performed to verify the impact of ENMs on specific cellular pathways Taken together, these results have provided a systematic overview of nano–bio interactions and served to shed light on the role of chemical composition and surface modifications of ENMs. Our results show that ENMs that appear biologically inert when assessed using conventional toxicity assays can still yield striking low-dose effects on cells
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
