Abstract

Objective: To investigate the value of standard [digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA] and advanced (mpMRI, prostate biopsy) clinical evaluation for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in contemporary patients with clinical bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) scheduled for Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 397 patients, who were referred to our tertiary care laser center for HoLEP due to BOO between 11/2017 and 07/2020. Of those, 83 (20.7%) underwent further advanced clinical PCa evaluation with mpMRI and/or prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA and/or lowered PSA ratio and/or suspicious DRE. Logistic regression and binary regression tree models were applied to identify PCa in BOO patients.Results: An mpMRI was conducted in 56 (66%) of 83 patients and revealed PIRADS 4/5 lesions in 14 (25%) patients. Subsequently, a combined systematic randomized and MRI-fusion biopsy was performed in 19 (23%) patients and revealed in PCa detection in four patients (5%). A randomized prostate biopsy was performed in 31 (37%) patients and revealed in PCa detection in three patients (4%). All seven patients (9%) with PCa detection underwent radical prostatectomy with 29% exhibiting non-organ confined disease. Incidental PCa after HoLEP (n = 76) was found in nine patients (12%) with advanced clinical PCa evaluation preoperatively. In univariable logistic regression analyses, PSA, fPSA ratio, and PSA density failed to identify patients with PCa detection. Conversely, patients with a lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and PIRADs 4/5 lesion in mpMRI were at higher risk for PCa detection. In multivariable adjusted analyses, PIRADS 4/5 lesions were confirmed as an independent risk factor (OR 9.91, p = 0.04), while IPSS did not reach significance (p = 0.052).Conclusion: In advanced clinical PCa evaluation mpMRI should be considered in patients with elevated total PSA or low fPSA ratio scheduled for BOO treatment with HoLEP. Patients with low IPSS or PIRADS 4/5 lesions in mpMRI are at highest risk for PCa detection. In patients with a history of two or more sets of negative prostate biopsies, advanced clinical PCa evaluation might be omitted.

Highlights

  • Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) remains the current standard of care in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after failure of pharmacological treatment [1]

  • We aimed to investigate the efficacy of standard (DRE, prostate-specific antigen (PSA)) and advanced clinical evaluation for prostate cancer (PCa) detection in patients with clinical BOO scheduled for HoLEP

  • Of the 397 patients, who were referred to our tertiary care laser center for HoLEP due to suspected BPH between 11/2017 and 07/2020, 83 patients (20.7%) underwent further examinations, based on suspicious prostate characteristics (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) remains the current standard of care in the treatment of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) due to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients with severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after failure of pharmacological treatment [1]. Since for both BPH and prostate cancer (PCa) elderly men account for the majority of patients and age represents a major risk factor, cancerous lesions may be present in BPH patients [2,3,4,5]. In the contemporary literature, little is known about PCa detection rates of advanced clinical PCa evaluation using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) or prostate biopsies in patients with clinical BOO

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.