Abstract

This study proposes variable balancing approaches for the exploration (diversification) and exploitation (intensification) of the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II (NSGA-II) with simulated binary crossover (SBX) and polynomial mutation (PM) in the multiobjective automatic parameter calibration of a lumped hydrological model, the HYMOD model. Two objectives—minimizing the percent bias and minimizing three peak flow differences—are considered in the calibration of the six parameters of the model. The proposed balancing approaches, which migrate the focus between exploration and exploitation over generations by varying the crossover and mutation distribution indices of SBX and PM, respectively, are compared with traditional static balancing approaches (the two dices value is fixed during optimization) in a benchmark hydrological calibration problem for the Leaf River (1950 km2) near Collins, Mississippi. Three performance metrics—solution quality, spacing, and convergence—are used to quantify and compare the quality of the Pareto solutions obtained by the two different balancing approaches. The variable balancing approaches that migrate the focus of exploration and exploitation differently for SBX and PM outperformed other methods.

Highlights

  • A rainfall–runoff (RR) model is a mathematical model used to describe the RR process of a watershed, which generally produces a surface runoff hydrograph using a hyetograph [1]

  • The proposed balancing approaches, which migrate the focus between exploration and exploitation over generations by varying the crossover and mutation distribution indices, CDI and MDI, respectively, were compared to traditional static balancing approaches in a benchmark hydrological calibration problem for the Leaf River (1950 km2 ) near Collins, Mississippi

  • Two objectives considered in the multiobjective optimization are determined

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A rainfall–runoff (RR) model is a mathematical model used to describe the RR process of a watershed, which generally produces a surface runoff hydrograph (output) using a hyetograph (input) [1]. A hydrologist wants to develop a hydrological model with high accuracy (i.e., the former case for minimizing a bias) and and high precision (i.e., the latter case for a reliable performance). During the past two decades, the development and calibration of RR models have been the focus of hydrological research [2,3]. Various RR models have been developed and are classified into lumped and distributed models. The former is based on the assumption that the entire basin has a homogeneous hydrological characteristic, whereas the latter divides the basin into elementary unit areas resembling a grid network to consider the spatial variability of the basin characteristics

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.