Abstract

Abstract Background Elevated levels of troponin I (hsTnT) and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) have been related with poor prognosis in patients with LFLG-AS. Biomarkers are less expensive, more practical and more accessible than imaging tests, so their use can be an alternative to imaging in the evaluation of patients with LFLG-AS. Purpose The aim of the present study is to assess multimodality imaging findings according to systemic biomarkers (i.e. hsTnT and BNP) in Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis (LFLG-AS) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) patients. Methods Prospective study with LFLG-AS patients (LVEF <50%, aortic valve area ≤1,0 cm2 and mean gradient <40 mmHg) that underwent hsTNnT, BNP, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) with T1 mapping and 2 dimensional echocardiogram (2DEcho). All patients also underwent dobutamine stress echocardiogram to define aortic stenosis severity. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to BNP and hsTnT levels: Group 1: BNP and hsTnT levels below median (BNP <395 pg/ml and TnI-Ultra <0.042 ng/ml); Group 2: BNP or hsTnT higher than median; and Group 3: both hsTnT and BNP higher than median. Results 49 patients with LFLG-AS were included (Group 1: 17 patients, Group 2: 14 patients and Group 3: 18 patients). Clinical characteristics (including risk scores) were not able to stratify these groups. Patients with elevation of both biomarkers had lower valvuloarterial impedance (P=0.03), lower LVEF (P=0.02), less moderate/severe mitral (P=0.01) and tricuspid regurgitation (P<0.01) by 2DEcho. CMR identified a progressive increase (from Group 1 to 3) of right and left chamber volumes; reduction in right and left ejection fraction and a marked increase in myocardial fibrosis assessed by extracellular volume (ECV) and indexed extracellular volume (iECV) (Figure 1). Conclusion Higher levels of BNP and hsTnT in LFLG-AS patients were associated with worse multi-modality imaging parameters and can be a surrogate of cardiac remodeling. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public Institution(s). Main funding source(s): No funding

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call