Abstract
This study aims to examine the difference in meaning in the verbal analysis of Mie Sedaap and Indomie instant noodles advertisements. This study aims to determine the difference in meaning in verbal analysis at the level of Systemic Functional Linguistics, namely ideational, interpersonal, and textual metafunctions. The data were analyzed using Halliday's (2006) theory of Systemic Functional Linguistics. The data is the words contained in the Mie Sedaap and Indomie ad videos. This research method uses descriptive qualitative research. The results showed that there were some differences in the two advertisements in using Systemic Functional Linguistics, namely the analysis of mood, attitude, modality, graduation, and theme. The five differences are dominated by Mie Sedaap advertisements.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
