Abstract

The freshwater shrimp genus Cryphiops Dana, 1852 has a disjunct distribution in North (Mexico) and South (Brazil, Chile) America, and is composed of only six species. The current classification of genera in the Palaemonidae is controversial, based on variable morphological characters, and still far from a clear definition. Cryphiops differs from the speciose genus Macrobrachium Spence Bate, 1868 only by the absence of the hepatic spines on the carapace. Previous studies with a limited dataset suggested the necessity to link morphology and phylogeny to create an internal rearrangement in the genus to resolve the paraphyletic status. Through a molecular phylogenetic approach, the evolutionary relationships are inferred based on four (mitochondrial and nuclear) genes, among all recognized species of Cryphiops and, in combination with a taxonomic revision, a rearrangement in the systematics of the genus is suggested. The absence of hepatic spines on the carapace, the only character used to separate the genus Cryphiops, is subjective and should be considered as a homoplasy. This implies that Cryphiops and Macrobrachium are subjective synonyms and, because the latter genus is much more diverse and widely known, with several economically important species, to avoid confusion and disturbance in nomenclatural stability and keep universality, a proposal for the priority of the older synonym (Cryphiops) to be partially suppressed in favor of maintaining the prevailing use of the younger synonym (Macrobrachium) is presented. As the species of Cryphiops should be accommodated in the genus Macrobrachium, new names to replace three preoccupied specific names that, by this action, resulted to be secondary homonyms are offered.

Highlights

  • During the 2010s, caridean shrimp systematics has undergone considerable changes at different levels

  • The topology obtained by Maximum Likelihood (ML) with the four concatenated genes (Fig. 1) showed a clear positioning of the genus Cryphiops nested among the species of Macrobrachium as was found in previous studies (Pereira 1997; Porter et al 2005; Page et al 2008; Pileggi and Mantelatto 2010)

  • Our phylogenetic analysis of all species of Cryphiops, including species of Macrobrachium from America, Africa, and the Indo-Pacific, using morphological and multigene approaches in combination with a taxonomic revision, revealed that the morphological character used to separate the genus Cryphiops is subjective and homoplasic, and that all Cryphiops species are nested within Macrobrachium

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the 2010s, caridean shrimp systematics has undergone considerable changes at different levels (see De Grave et al 2015a for review of the context and literature). The family consists of a large group of decapod crustaceans comprising 151 genera and approximately 780 species (WoRMS 2021), which reached a great evolutionary success, occupying marine, estuarine, and freshwater environments Members of this group have a long taxonomic history and it can be considered a challenge to build a more natural classification since their morphology is highly conservative (Holthuis 1950, 1952a; Pereira 1997; Murphy and Austin 2005; Pileggi and Mantelatto 2010; De Grave and Ashelby 2013). After the construction of this major guideline, some important specific and complementary taxonomic initiatives were developed focusing on different taxa (for a review see De Grave et al 2015a) Despite this significant advance, the current knowledge is not sufficient to cover the tremendous diversity of palaemonids and the many questions that remain unanswered. Only Cryphiops (C.) caementarius (Molina, 1782) needs estuarine water to complete its reproductive cycle while the other five [Cryphiops (Bithynops) brasiliensis Gomes Corrêa, 1973, Cryphiops (Bithynops) luscus (Holthuis, 1973), Cryphiops (Bithynops) perspicax (Holthuis, 1977), Cryphiops (Bithynops) sbordonii Baldari, Mejía-Ortiz & López-Mejía, 2010, and Cryphiops (Bithynops) villalobosi Villalobos Hiriart, Nates Rodríguez & Cantú Díaz Barriga, 1989] are restricted to inland waters with no apparent dependency of estuarine environments

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call