Abstract
The multifunctionality nature of agriculture has been used to justify continuing protection for the agricultural sector. The farm sector produces a variety of outputs, some of which are marketable (or tradable) and others not. Protectionism, under the guise of multifunctionality, is then justified to support the non-marketed dimensions of the agricultural sector. We examine the impacts of trade policies on the loss or gain of economic welfare caused by the divergence between social and private marginal cost. Next, we analyse how social and marginal costs are affected by the assignment of property rights and the implications of non-traded goods. Critical in each of these formulations is the magnitude and direction of the divergence between social and private marginal cost. In the USA, agriculture faces increasing regulations, recognising that agriculture produces negative and positive externalities. In this context, we examine the policy implications of multifunctionality.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.