Abstract

Assessment of the integrity of the multifidus muscles and corresponding nerve roots, post-open (OSS) versus minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) for lumbar spine fractures. We investigated the first six patients undergoing MISS in our institution and age- and sex-matched them with 6 random patients who previously had OSS. All had a similar lumbar fracture configuration without evidence of spinal cord injury. All were assessed using ultrasound muscle quantification and electromyographic studies at a minimum of 6months post-operatively. Mean cross-sectional area (CSA) was measured at sequential levels within and adjacent to the operative field. Concentric needle electromyography was performed at instrumented and adjacent non-instrumented levels in each patient. Mean CSA across all lumbar multifidus muscles was 4.29cm(2) in the MISS group, 2.26cm(2) for OSS (p=0.08). At the instrumented levels, mean CSA was 4.21cm(2) for MISS and 2.03cm(2) for OSS (p=0.12). At non-instrumented adjacent levels, mean CSA was 4.46cm(2) in the MISS group, 2.87cm(2) for OSS (p=0.05). Electromyography at non-instrumented adjacent levels demonstrated nerve function within normal limits in 5/6 levels in the MISS group compared to 1/6 levels in the OSS (p=0.03). Instrumented levels demonstrated nerve function within normal limits in 5/12 levels in the MISS group compared with 4/12 in the OSS group, including moderate-severe denervation at 5 levels in the OSS group (p=0.15). Posterior instrumented MISS demonstrates a significantly superior preservation of the medial branch of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve and less muscle atrophy, particularly at adjacent levels when compared to OSS.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call