Abstract

The increasing pace of gene discovery in the last decade has brought a major change in the way the genetic causes of brain malformations are being diagnosed. Unbiased genomic screening has gained the first place in the diagnostic protocol of a child with congenital (brain) anomalies and the detected variants are matched with the phenotypic presentation afterwards. This process is defined as "reverse phenotyping". Screening of DNA, through copy number variant analysis of microarrays and analysis of exome data on different platforms, obtained from the index patient and both parents has become a routine approach in many centers worldwide. Clinicians are used to multidisciplinary team interaction in patient care and disease management and this explains why the majority of research that has led to the discovery of new genetic disorders nowadays proceeds from clinical observations to genomic analysis and to data exchange facilitated by open access sharing databases. However, the relevance of multidisciplinary team interaction has not been object of systematic research in the field of brain malformations. This review will illustrate some examples of how diagnostically driven questions through multidisciplinary interaction, among clinical and preclinical disciplines, can be successful in the discovery of new genes related to brain malformations. The first example illustrates the setting of interaction among neurologists, geneticists and neuro-radiologists. The second illustrates the importance of interaction among clinical dysmorphologists for pattern recognition of syndromes with multiple congenital anomalies. The third example shows how fruitful it can be to step out of the "clinical comfort zone", and interact with basic scientists in applying emerging technologies to solve the diagnostic puzzles.

Highlights

  • The etiological diagnosis of brain malformations is a complex and time-consuming process that demands skills and collaboration with different specialists and with the patient family

  • We have reviewed here three different approaches that have led to successful identification of new genes involved in malformations of cortical development (MCD), each of them starting from observation of undiagnosed patient and involving the collaboration among several disciplines

  • Prospective studies in the field of cancer genomics have shown that a multidisciplinary genomics review board is needed for appropriate interpretation of the genomic data obtained from tissue analysis, and for stratification of patients for the appropriate therapy, for referral to clinical trials and for clinical genetics review (Moore DA et al 2019)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The etiological diagnosis of brain malformations is a complex and time-consuming process that demands skills and collaboration with different specialists and with the patient family. This has led to a consensus statement by a group of renowned geneticists, pediatricians and scientists, who suggest for the taxonomy of rare genetic disorders a “dyadic approach to the delineation of diagnostic entities”, including 1) evidence for pathogenic gene variant associated with 2) one or more, as distinct as possible, phenotypes (Biesecker L et al 2021).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call