Abstract

Poverty alleviation, socio-economic wellbeing, and sustainable livelihood of the stakeholders are among the prime initiatives of the 2030 shared prosperity vision of the Malaysian government. The agenda is part of the blueprint in the 2030 vision for the period of 2021 to 2030 to increase the income of all ethnic groups particularly the Bumiputeras comprising the lower-income group which is referred to as B40, the hard-core poor, the economically poor, those in economic transition, Orang Asli, Sabah, Sarawak Bumiputeras, the disabled, youths, women, children and senior citizens by 2030. Therefore, the present study investigates the current status and the influencing factors of multidimensional deprivation comprising health safety, education, and living standard among the lower-income group in Malaysia’s wealthiest state, Selangor. The study adopts a quantitative approach in analysing the primary data from 404 samples of the B40 groups of the population that reside in Selangor nine districts. A purposive stratified random sampling method is used to select the respondents. Descriptive statistics, econometric techniques, Malaysian Human Poverty Index (MPHI) are utilised in the analysis. Based on Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) result, the study revealed that the overall incidence of deprivation to the access of basic education among the households was 1.26%, access to basic healthcare deprivation was 1.95%, and standard of living deprivation was 4.51% among the lower-income group in Selangor, Malaysia consequently. The study also checked the intensity of the deprivation gap within the above category of indicators and concluded that there is 2.51% still away from basic education access, 3.98% for basic healthcare, 36.14 % of them are in the standard of living deprivation stage among the lower income group in Selangor, Malaysia. Finally, the present study summarized that overall Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) score whereas, there is 0.0029 or .29% of the respondent are depriving together in the category of basic education, health, and standard of living among the lower income group in Selangor, Malaysia.

Highlights

  • Poverty alleviation, socio-economic wellbeing and sustainable livelihood of the stakeholders are among the prime initiatives of the Malaysian government (Chua & Oh, 2011; Kronbak & Vestergaard, 2011)

  • The government has released its blueprint in the shared prosperity vision 2030 for the period 2021 to 2030 with an aim to increase an income of all ethnic groups the Bumiputeras comprising the lower income group which is referred to as Bottom 40 Percent (B40), the hardcore poor, the economically poor, those in economic transition, Orang Asli, Sabah, Sarawak Bumiputeras, the disabled, youths, women, children and senior citizens (Loheswar, 2019; Zakiah, 2019)

  • The majority of them are in the range of 41-50 years old 25% which is followed by the 3140 years old group 23.26%, 18-30 years old group 20.54%, in the same way, 51-60 years-old group 18.70 %, and the 65 to 71 or older age group 13.12 in the state of Selangor, Malaysia respectively

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Socio-economic wellbeing and sustainable livelihood of the stakeholders are among the prime initiatives of the Malaysian government (Chua & Oh, 2011; Kronbak & Vestergaard, 2011). The rate of overall poverty in Malaysia has been declining to a negligible percentage, the specific threat from poverty is still noticeable among certain groups as well as certain areas and states They are still facing big challenges to provide enough opportunities for Income Generating Activities (IGAs) towards low income group to achieve certain standards in certain areas. The low income still experience social inequity, deprive of access to education, healthcare, credit availability, income opportunity and securing property rights (Courtenay, 1988; Nair, 2001; Nor, 1991; Ali, Kronbak & Vestergaard, 2011; Rahman, Bhuiyan & Sina, 2014). This group requires specific policy interventions especially on capability development in order to achieve upward mobility. Income disparities between ethnic groups and regions must still be actively addressed

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call