Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) leaflet restriction measurements with fluoroscopy measurements in commonly used mechanical prosthetic heart valves (PHVs). Four mechanical PHVs (ON-X, Carbomedics, St. Jude, and Medtronic Hall) were imaged in a pulsatile model using fluoroscopy and 64-detector-row computed tomography. Five image acquisitions of each PHV without (1) and with (4) restricted leaflet closure were made. Three observers measured closure angles on fluoroscopy and MDCT. Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman plots. Interobserver agreement was high in restricted and non-restricted leaflets on both modalities (ICCs >0.995). MDCT and fluoroscopy showed high agreements (ICCs >0.989). Median MDCT closure angle measurements differed at most -2 to +2 degrees from fluoroscopy in the restricted and -1 to +2 degrees in the non-restricted leaflets. MDCT allows measurement of leaflet motion with a maximal median discrepancy of 2 degrees. Both MDCT and fluoroscopy detect restricted leaflet closure with great accuracy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
