Abstract

<p><strong>Purpose:</strong> The aim of this paper is to provide an overview and critical outlook of current evaluation tools for the implementation of the UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) approach, focusing on the need of multidimensional / multistakeholder evaluation and impact assessment to turn heritage / landscape into a driver of sustainable development.</p><p><strong>Methodology/Approach:</strong> We analyse the definition of Historic Urban Landscape comparing the thoretical mandate to current tools / practices. Based on literature review and critical analysis of recent experiences, we identify indicators categories and evaluation methods that can be applied for a reacher cost-benefit analysis.</p><p><strong>Findings:</strong> Indicators and evaluation methods for multidmensional impact assessment of conservation / regeneration are not applied in HUL recent initiatives and guidelines. Evaluation tools can be developed and tested to inform decision-making processes and to turn the cultural value of heritage / landscape into a resource able to attract investments. A framework for HUL impact assessment can be structured including wellbeing indicators and stakeholders analysis.</p><p><strong>Research Limitation/implication:</strong> New hybrid tools are proposed, providing a possible toolkit for evaluation. However, it needs further testing and implementation.</p><p><strong>Originality/Value of paper:</strong> This paper contributes to bridging the gap between the theoretical approach of the Historic Urban Landscape and its operative practice. The HUL approach has been generally acquired in the theoretical research, but its implementation is still sporadic, and unframed into urban regeneration policies. Evaluation tools are not incorporated in the HUL practices. This paper aims to advance the existing knowledge on evaluation tools to make operational the HUL approach.</p>

Highlights

  • Urban heritage conservation in rapid transformation contexts is a great challenge for today’s cities (Bandarin and Van Oers, 2012; Bandarin and Van Oers, 2014)

  • The objective of this paper is to provide an overview and critical outlook of current evaluation tools for the implementation of the UNESCO Historic Urban Landscape approach, towards a comprehensive framework for impact assessment of HUL conservation / regeneration

  • The guidelines identify specific tools based on the 2011 Recommendations: community engagement tools (Planning, GIS, Big data, Morphology, Impact / vulnerability assessment, Policy assessment), knowledge and planning tools (Publicity, Dialogue and consultation, Community empowerment, Cultural mapping), regulatory systems (Laws and regulations, Traditional custom, Policies and Plans), financial tools (Economics, Grants, Public-private cooperation)

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Urban heritage conservation in rapid transformation contexts is a great challenge for today’s cities (Bandarin and Van Oers, 2012; Bandarin and Van Oers, 2014). The definition of Historic Urban Landscape (HUL) considers the “historic layering of cultural and natural values and attributes, extending beyond the notion of ‘historic centre’ or ‘ensemble’ to include the broader urban context and its geographical setting” (Art. 8). It includes “perceptions and visual relationships”, “social and cultural practices and values, economic processes and the intangible dimensions of heritage as related to diversity and identity” (Art. 9).

EVALUATION TOOLS
Realize
Historic Urban Landscape evaluation: recent experiences
BES indicators of Sustainable and Equitable Wellbeing
Subjective well-being
Objective indicators
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call