Abstract

Predicting the council candidate becomes difficult due to the large number of criteria that must be known and identified. The best candidate should be chosen from among the candidates because he or she will play an important role in the organization or institution. It is critical to find the right and best candidate these days because people see and judge the outcome from the candidate in a short time with the help of social media. Perhaps the organization and institution require the best candidate criteria because they will manage and organize the community around them. This study focuses on how to prioritize council candidates using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for determine the criteria and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) for prioritize the student council candidate. This proposed framework based on Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) will be used to recommend and assist students in selecting the best candidate for student council. The three criteria chosen were grade point average (GPA), Age, and Semester. Based on the results of the questionnaire and a review of the literature, these criteria were developed. The three criteria were then used to determine the most important criterion for selecting the student council. The AHP weight is used to determine and prioritize the most important criteria. TOPSIS was used to select the most qualified student council candidate. The findings show that GPA is the most important criteria in selecting the best candidate, and the TOPSIS findings support the AHP findings.

Highlights

  • Universities or institutions of higher learning (HLI) provide a variety of responsibilities, such as delivering a high-quality academic curriculum and involving students in extracurricular activities such as sports

  • The student representative council (SRC) is an annual council of university students elected by their peers

  • Students that join in Student Representative Council (SRC) become participants in the institution's internal decisionmaking process, enabling them to participate in the governance of the university [3]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Universities or institutions of higher learning (HLI) provide a variety of responsibilities, such as delivering a high-quality academic curriculum and involving students in extracurricular activities such as sports. The candidate from anybody who selects a treasurer and designates a primary depository, as well as anyone who submits qualifying papers and administers a candidate's oath in compliance with relevant law, is exempt. The goals of this system are to design, implement, and test a web-based system for choosing candidates for the SRC election based on criteria provided by the university. The proposed system focus on predicting the SRC candidates among students. To determine or predict the best SRC candidate, AHP methods are used to get the best criteria for choosing the candidate. The weight of criteria will be used in TOPSIS to rank and predict the best candidate based on the criteria chosen

LITERATURE REVIEW
Criteria on Student Council Candidate
AHP and TOPSIS
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Result and Analysis
Weighted by AHP
Criteria Evaluation by TOPSIS
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.