Abstract
Alternative design solutions of buildings can be successfully evaluated applying Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods. There are a lot of methods available for supporting complex decisions in construction. However, previous research works show that various MCDM methods can produce different ranking results. Accordingly, three criteria of optimality, namely WSM (Weighted Sum Model), WPM (Weighted Product Model) and joint method of the latters called WASPAS (Weighted Aggregated Sum Product ASsessment) are applied, and their peculiarities are examined by comparing to well-known and reputed MOORA (Multiple Objective Optimisation on the basis of Ratio Analysis) method. A case study of ranking the facades for public and commercial buildings is presented.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
