Abstract

Inversion of band- and offset-limited single component (P wave) seismic data does not provide robust estimates of subsurface elastic parameters and density. Multicomponent seismic data can, in principle, circumvent this limitation but adds to the complexity of the inversion algorithm because it requires simultaneous optimization of multiple objective functions, one for each data component. In seismology, these multiple objectives are typically handled by constructing a single objective given as a weighted sum of the objectives of individual data components and sometimes with additional regularization terms reflecting their interdependence; which is then followed by a single objective optimization. Multi-objective problems, inclusive of the multicomponent seismic inversion are however non-linear. They have nonunique solutions, known as the Pareto-optimal solutions. Therefore, casting such problems as a single objective optimization provides one out of the entire set of the Pareto-optimal solutions, which in turn, may be biased by the choice of the weights. To handle multiple objectives, it is thus appropriate to treat the objective as a vector and simultaneously optimize each of its components so that the entire Pareto-optimal set of solutions could be estimated. This paper proposes such a novel multi-objective methodology using a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for waveform inversion of multicomponent seismic data. The applicability of the method is demonstrated using synthetic data generated from multilayer models based on a real well log. We document that the proposed method can reliably extract subsurface elastic parameters and density from multicomponent seismic data both when the subsurface is considered isotropic and transversely isotropic with a vertical symmetry axis. We also compute approximate uncertainty values in the derived parameters. Although we restrict our inversion applications to horizontally stratified models, we outline a practical procedure of extending the method to approximately include local dips for each source-receiver offset pair. Finally, the applicability of the proposed method is not just limited to seismic inversion but it could be used to invert different data types not only requiring multiple objectives but also multiple physics to describe them.

Highlights

  • Pre-stack waveform inversion (PWI) of single component (P wave) seismic reflection data has been shown and used as an effective tool for subsurface characterization

  • Considering only the primary and vertically polarized shear (P–SV) mode and neglecting the horizontally polarized shear (SH) mode, propagation of elastic waves in VTI medium is controlled by four elastic constants (C11, C13, C33 and C44 or VP0, VS0, ε and δ) and density, requiring the inverse methods to extract a total of five parameters from the seismic waveform data

  • Since NSGA II is a population-based evolutionary algorithms (EAs), it can be cast into a framework of Bayesian statistics where a prior distribution of all model parameters in the decision space could be combined with the physics of the forward problem, that is, the computation of the forward synthetic seismic responses for all models generated during the entire course of the NSGA II run to get an estimate of the a posteriori probability density (PPD) function in the decision space

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Pre-stack waveform inversion (PWI) of single component (P wave) seismic reflection data has been shown and used as an effective tool for subsurface characterization. Considering only the primary and vertically polarized shear (P–SV) mode and neglecting the horizontally polarized shear (SH) mode, propagation of elastic waves in VTI medium is controlled by four elastic constants (C11, C13, C33 and C44 or VP0, VS0, ε and δ) and density (see Thomsen 1986 for details), requiring the inverse methods to extract a total of five parameters from the seismic waveform data Such a problem of estimating five parameters is non-linear and non-unique and has a high chance of getting stuck in a local extremum of the objective function associated with the inverse problem. For isotropic and VTI media, the elastic stiffness matrix takes the form (Auld 1973):

C11 C13 0 0
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.