Abstract

For a graph H and an integer k≥1, let r(H;k) and rℓ(H;k) denote the k-color Ramsey number and list Ramsey number of H, respectively. Alon, Bucić, Kalvari, Kuperwasser and Szabó in 2021 initiated the systematic study of list Ramsey numbers of graphs and hypergraphs, and conjectured that r(K1,n;k) and rℓ(K1,n;k) are always equal. Motivated by their work, we study the k-color Ramsey number for double stars S(n,m), where n≥m≥1. To the best of our knowledge, little is known on the exact value of r(S(n,m);k) when k≥3. A classic result of Erdős and Graham from 1975 asserts that r(T;k)>k(n−1)+1 for every tree T with n≥1 edges and k sufficiently large such that n divides k−1. Using a folklore double counting argument in set system and the edge chromatic number of complete graphs, we prove that if k is odd and n is sufficiently large compared with m and k, thenr(S(n,m);k)=kn+m+2. This is a step in our effort to determine whether r(S(n,m);k) and rℓ(S(n,m);k) are always equal, which remains wide open. We also prove that r(Snm;k)=k(n−1)+m+2 if k is odd and n is sufficiently large compared with m and k, where 1≤m≤n and Snm is obtained from K1,n by subdividing m edges each exactly once. We end the paper with some observations towards the list Ramsey number for S(n,m) and Snm.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.