Abstract
In social insects, the high variability in the number of queens per colony raises fundamental questions about the evolution of altruism. It is hypothesized, for instance, that nestmate recognition should be less efficient in polygynous than in monogynous colonies because the presence of several breeders increases the diversity of genetically determined recognition cues, leading to a less specific colonial signature. Recent studies, however, have shown that the link between the number of queens in a colony and the recognition abilities of its members is more complex than previously suggested. Here, we studied intraspecific aggression, diversity of potential recognition cues and genetic structure of colonies in the highly polygynous ant Crematogaster pygmaea. Our results reveal that workers of this species are clearly aggressive towards non-nestmates in field experiments but not in more artificial bioassays conducted in Petri dishes, underscoring the importance of context-dependent aspects of the assessment of nestmate recognition. Behavioural, genetic and chemical data show that C. pygmaea is a multicolonial species, forming spatially restricted and well-defined entities. Therefore, the postulated negative correlation between recognition ability of workers and queen number in a colony is not supported by the results of this study.
Highlights
IntroductionNestmate recognition is essential to ensure the cohesion of the colony
In social insects, nestmate recognition is essential to ensure the cohesion of the colony
Colonies with several queens are frequently recorded in social insects, ants (Bourke & Franks, 1995), and polygyny is generally associated with a lower relatedness among nestmate workers and constitutes a major evolutionary paradox (Keller, 1995)
Summary
Nestmate recognition is essential to ensure the cohesion of the colony. In monogynous and monoandrous species, nestmate recognition leads to efficient kin discrimination since all members of the colony are closely related. Colonies with several queens are frequently recorded in social insects, ants (Bourke & Franks, 1995), and polygyny is generally associated with a lower relatedness among nestmate workers and constitutes a major evolutionary paradox (Keller, 1995). In several highly polygynous species forming large unicolonial structures or super-colonies, aggression between workers from relatively distant nests is completely absent (e.g. Tsutsui et al, 2000; Holway et al, 2002). The relationship between social structure (monogynous vs polygynous) and colony closure in ants is more complex than previously suggested
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.