Abstract
This study has provided an approach to classify soil using machine learning. Multiclass elements of stand-alone machine learning algorithms (i.e. logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural network (ANN)), decision tree ensembles (i.e. decision forest (DF) and decision jungle (DJ)), and meta-ensemble models (i.e. stacking ensemble (SE) and voting ensemble (VE)) were used to classify soils based on their intrinsic physico-chemical properties. Also, the multiclass prediction was carried out across multiple cross-validation (CV) methods, i.e. train validation split (TVS), k -fold cross-validation (KFCV), and Monte Carlo cross-validation (MCCV). Results indicated that the soils' clay fraction (CF) had the most influence on the multiclass prediction of natural soils' plasticity while specific surface and carbonate content (CC) possessed the least within the nature of the dataset used in this study. Stand-alone machine learning models (LR and ANN) produced relatively less accurate predictive performance (accuracy of 0.45, average precision of 0.5, and average recall of 0.44) compared to tree-based models (accuracy of 0.68, average precision of 0.71, and recall rate of 0.68), while the meta-ensembles (SE and VE) outperformed (accuracy of 0.75, average precision of 0.74, and average recall rate of 0.72) all the models utilised for multiclass classification. Sensitivity analysis of the meta-ensembles proved their capacities to discriminate between soil classes across the methods of CV considered. Machine learning training and validation using MCCV and KFCV methods enabled better prediction while also ensuring that the dataset was not overfitted by the machine learning models. Further confirmation of this phenomenon was depicted by the continuous rise of the cumulative lift curve (LC) of the best performing models when using the MCCV technique. Overall, this study demonstrated that soil's physico-chemical properties do have a direct influence on plastic behaviour and, therefore, can be relied upon to classify soils.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.