Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the value of ICD-9-CM code for identifying celiac disease (CD). MethodsWe searched administrative data to identify all adults with ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 579.0 (CD) at three teaching hospitals between 2000 and 2010. We then stratified patients according to the presence/absence of relevant serology and endoscopy codes into four groups: None, serology, endoscopy, and both. A diagnostic algorithm was applied to define CD status. ResultsThrough random sampling and appropriate weighting, the 1200 reviewed patients represented a cohort of 8,122 cases. The overall positive predictive value (PPV) of the ICD-9-CM code was 15% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13%–17%). Case identification by a diagnosis code alone had a PPV of 4%, whereas the group with diagnosis code plus both serology and endoscopy testing had a PPV of 49%. Independent predictors of CD were non-Hispanic white, ICD-9-CM–coded patient group, total number of a diagnosis code, and receiving a diagnosis code by a gastroenterologist. The model had an area under the curve of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84–0.89). ConclusionsThe performance of ICD-9-CM 579.0 alone for identifying CD is extremely poor. Adding other readily available administrative data significantly improves CD case identification. The proposed case finding strategy via administrative databases may facilitate future research on CD.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.