Multicenter Comparison of Nonsupine Versus Supine Positioning During Intubation in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.

Abstract

Head-up positioning for preoxygenation and ramping for morbidly obese patients are well-accepted techniques, but the effect of head-up positioning with full torso elevation for all intubations is controversial. We compared first-pass success, adverse events, and glottic view between supine (SP) and nonsupine (NSP) positioning for emergency department (ED) patients undergoing orotracheal intubation. We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for ED intubations over a 2-year period from 25 participating centers in the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR). We compared characteristics and outcomes for adult patients intubated orotracheally in SP and NSP positions with either a direct or video laryngoscope. We report odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for categorical variables and interquartile ranges with 95% CI for continuous variables. Our primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success and secondary outcomes were glottic views and peri-intubation adverse events. Of 11,480 total intubations, 5.8% were performed in NSP. The NSP group included significantly more obese patients (OR= 2.2 [95% CI= 1.9-2.6]) and patients with a suspected difficult airway (OR= 1.8 [95% CI=1.6-2.2]). First-pass success (adjusted OR= 1.1 [95% CI= 0.9-1.4]) and overall rate of grade I glottic views (OR=1.1 [95% CI= 0.9-1.2]) were similar between groups while NSP had a significantly higher rate of grade I views when direct laryngoscopy was employed (OR=1.27 [95% CI= 1.04-1.54]). NSP was associated with higher odds of any adverse event (OR= 1.4 [95% CI= 1.1-1.7]). ED providers utilized SP in most ED intubations but were more likely to use NSP for patients who were obese or in whom they predicted a difficult airway. We found no differences in first-pass success between groups but total adverse events were more likely in NSP. A randomized trial comparing patient positioning during intubation in the ED is warranted.