Abstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming an established tool across the biological and medical sciences. Despite the evident successes and wide adoption of eDNA approaches, some fundamental questions remain. For instance, there is almost a dogma in the field around the superiority of mitochondrial DNA for use in eDNA studies, however robust comparison with nuclear eDNA is widely lacking. The dominance of mitochondrial-based eDNA for animal and plant studies appears to be largely settled, despite a widespread lack of rigorous nuclear eDNA testing. Outside of the source organism the protections conferred on eDNA by the cell, mitochondrial and nuclear membranes are poorly understood, including the contribution of each to eDNA persistence and degradation. Utilizing shotgun sequencing to unbiasedly assess the level of nuclear and mitochondrial eDNA across samples, we reveal stark differences in nuclear versus mitochondrial eDNA persistence and abundance. By focusing too heavily on mitochondrial DNA alone the field is underutilizing eDNA's full potential.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
