Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper investigates commonly used approaches for fatigue crack nucleation analysis in rubber, including maximum principal strain (or stretch), strain energy density and octahedral shear strain criteria. The ability of these traditional equivalence criteria, as well as a recent equivalence criterion (the cracking energy density) to predict multiaxial fatigue behaviour is explored. Theoretical considerations are also introduced relating to the applicability of various fatigue life analysis approaches. These include the scalar nature of traditional equivalence criteria, robustness of the criteria investigated for a wide range of multiaxial loadings, effects of crack closure and applications to non‐proportional multiaxial loadings. It is shown that the notion of a stress or strain amplitude tensor used for the analysis of multiaxial loading in metals is not appropriate in the analysis of rubber due to nonlinearity associated with finite strains and near incompressibility. Taken together, these considerations illustrate that traditional criteria are not sufficiently consistent or complete to permit confident analysis of arbitrary multiaxial loading histories, and that an analysis approach specific to the failure plane is needed. Of the three traditional criteria, maximum principal strain is shown to match most closely to the cracking energy density criterion, in terms of a failure locus in principal stretch space.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.