Abstract

Multiunit site selection models have long ignored the impact of time delays in store openings. To determine the effect of this limitation and to identify a solution, we compare three multiunit site selection procedures. The first is a sequential procedure that selects sites and then opens them one at a time. The second is a global approach that selects all future sites in a single decision process. Third, is a proposed anticipated-delay procedure that incorporates opening delays, firm planning horizons and discount rates in determining appropriate sites for multiunit retail systems. We further compare the results of these site-selection procedures to similar procedures that incorporate leakage to unidentified competitors when seeking locations for new outlets. We make the comparisons based upon discounted revenues by using a two-party, game-like simulation. The simulation estimates revenue results under the various alternatives while allowing for reactive and preemptive competitive store openings. Our results indicate that the anticipated-delay procedure incorporating leakage produces a significantly better revenue stream than either the standard sequential or global approach procedures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call