Abstract

Hyperspectral remote sensing is considered to be an effective tool in crop monitoring and estimation of biomass. Many of the previous approaches are from single year or single date measurements, even though the complete crop growth with multiple years would be required for an appropriate estimation of biomass. The aim of this study was to estimate the fresh matter biomass (FMB) by terrestrial hyperspectral imaging of the three crops (lablab, maize and finger millet) under different levels of nitrogen fertiliser and water supply. Further, the importance of the different spectral regions for the estimation of FMB was assessed. The study was conducted in two experimental layouts (rainfed (R) and irrigated (I)) at the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, India. Spectral images and the FMB were collected over three years (2016–2018) during the growing season of the crops. Random forest regression method was applied to build FMB models. R² validation (R²val) and relative root mean square error prediction (rRMSEP) was used to evaluate the FMB models. The Generalised model (combination of R and I data) performed better for lablab (R²val = 0.53, rRMSEP = 13.9%), maize (R²val = 0.53, rRMSEP = 18.7%) and finger millet (R²val = 0.46, rRMSEP = 18%) than the separate FMB models for R and I. In the best derived model, the most important variables contributing to the estimation of biomass were in the wavelength ranges of 546–910 nm (lablab), 750–794 nm (maize) and 686–814 nm (finger millet). The deviation of predicted and measured FMB did not differ much among the different levels of N and water supply. However, there was a trend of overestimation at the initial stage and underestimation at the later stages of crop growth.

Highlights

  • The majority of India’s population (60%) depends on the agricultural sector for their livelihood [1]

  • It has been shown that random forest regression modelling based on multi-temporal hyperspectral imagery allows the prediction of fresh matter biomass of three major food and feed crops, i.e., lablab, maize and finger millet, grown in the monsoon season on vast areas of southern India

  • The results of this study showed that Generalised models, which were built on crop data from both rainfed and irrigated conditions, are more robust than water management specific models

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The majority of India’s population (60%) depends on the agricultural sector for their livelihood [1]. Agriculture depends mainly on monsoon rainfall, surface water and ground water irrigation. Since the variability of monsoon rainfall is high, it forces the south Indian farmers to adapt their irrigated areas to local water availability [2]. Irrigated crop production is a major contributor to the green revolution, which has enabled the country to be self-sufficient [3], accompanied by fertiliser application and other inputs in semi-arid parts of India. Fertiliser application with water supply is essential for a successful crop. Spectral data from Remote Sensing (RS) have been studied for many years for an adequate assessment of nutrient and water variability for yield optimisation [4,5,6]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call