Abstract

ContextBiodiversity is highly affected by industrial forestry, which leads to the loss and fragmentation of natural habitats. To date, most conservation studies have evaluated associations among a single species group, forest type, or spatial scale.ObjectiveThe objective was to evaluate the richness of multiple species groups across various forest types and characteristics at multiple scales.MethodsWe used the occurrence data for 277 species of conservation interest from 455 stands of high conservation value, including four species groups and four forest types.ResultsLocal, landscape, and regional forest characteristics influenced biodiversity in a non-uniform pattern among species groups and forest types. For example, an increased local spruce basal area in spruce forests was associated with higher vascular plant and bryophyte richness values, whereas macrofungi and lichen richness were positively correlated with deadwood availability, but negatively correlated with the spruce volume in the landscape. Furthermore, landscapes with twice as much mature forest as the average, had more than 50% higher richness values for vascular plants, macrofungi, and lichens.ConclusionAmong sessile species groups in northern forests, a uniform conservation strategy across forest types and scales is suboptimal. A multi-faceted strategy that acknowledges differences among species groups and forest types with tailored measures to promote richness is likely to be more successful. Nevertheless, the single most common measure associated with high richness across the species groups and forest types was mature forest in the landscape, which suggests that increasing old forests in the landscape is a beneficial conservation strategy.

Highlights

  • Biodiversity is maintained by multiple interactions among biotic and abiotic factors that operate at multiple spatial scales

  • The main question for this study is: How is the species richness of different species groups associated with forest characteristics commonly considered in forest conservation planning? To answer this, we addressed how the species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes, macrofungi, and lichens of conservation interest differ in relation to the availability of forest characteristics at multiple scales

  • We examined data from 277 species consisting of vascular plants (58), bryophytes (52), macrofungi (99), and lichens (68) that are of conservation interest

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biodiversity is maintained by multiple interactions among biotic and abiotic factors that operate at multiple spatial scales. The biotic interactions, including those related to habitat loss and fragmentation, determine variation at the landscape and local scale (e.g. Haddad et al 2015; Newbold et al 2016; Isbell et al 2017). There is no consensus over the relative importance of local versus landscape processes as drivers of biodiversity (Hodgson et al 2011; Fahrig 2013; Hanski 2015). There is a need to improve understanding about how different functional habitats (e.g. grasslands, wetlands, and old-growth forests) influence biodiversity and if such influence varies among species groups and over spatial scales (Poiani et al 2000; Gonthier et al 2014)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call