Abstract

Inadequate bowel preparation is associated with a decrease in adenoma detection rate (ADR). A deep learning-based bowel preparation assessment system based on the Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) has been previously established to calculate the automatic BBPS (e-BBPS) score (ranging 0-20). The aims of this study were to investigate whether there was a statistically inverse relationship between the e-BBPS score and the ADR, and to determine the threshold of e-BBPS score for adequate bowel preparation in colonoscopy screening. In this prospective, observational study, we trained and internally validated the e-BBPS system using retrospective colonoscopy images and videos from the Endoscopy Center of Wuhan University, annotated by endoscopists. We externally validated the system using colonoscopy images and videos from the First People's Hospital of Yichang and the Third Hospital of Wuhan. To prospectively validate the system, we recruited consecutive patients at Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University aged between 18 and 75 years undergoing colonoscopy. The exclusion criteria included: contraindication to colonoscopy, family polyposis syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, history of surgery for colorectal or colorectal cancer, known or suspected bowel obstruction or perforation, patients who were pregnant or lactating, inability to receive caecal intubation, and lumen obstruction. We did colonoscopy procedures and collected withdrawal videos, which were reviewed and the e-BBPS system was applied to all colon segments. The primary outcome of this study was ADR, defined as the proportion of patients with one or more conventional adenomas detected during colonoscopy. We calculated the ADR of each e-BBPS score and did a correlation analysis using Spearman analysis. From May 11 to Aug 10, 2020, 616 patients underwent screening colonoscopies, which evaluated. There was a significant inverse correlation between the e-BBPS score and ADR (Spearman's rank -0·976, p<0·010). The ADR for the e-BBPS scores 1-8 was 28·57%, 28·68%, 26·79%, 19·19%, 17·57%, 17·07%, 14·81%, and 0%, respectively. According to the 25% ADR standard for screening colonoscopy, an e-BBPS score of 3 was set as a threshold to guarantee an ADR of more than 25%, and so high-quality endoscopy. Patients with scores of more than 3 had a significantly lower ADR than those with a score of 3 or less (ADR 15·93% vs 28·03%, p<0·001, 95% CI 0·28-0·66, odds ratio 0·43). The e-BBPS system has potential to provide a more objective and refined threshold for the quantification of adequate bowel preparation. Project of Hubei Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Disease Minimally Invasive Incision and Hubei Province Major Science and Technology Innovation Project.

Highlights

  • Our study showed that deep learning-based calculations of the e-Boston bowel preparation scale (BBPS) score had a strong correlation with adenoma detection rate (ADR)

  • By setting a threshold according to the 25% ADR standard for screening colonoscopy, and comparing this with the patients whose established to calculate the automatic BBPS (e-BBPS) score was higher than this threshold, we found that patients with lower e-BBPS scores had a significantly higher ADR

  • Our study shows that the e-BBPS system can objectively, accurately, and stably help endoscopists assess bowel preparation, and can be readily integrated into routine colonoscopy

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Inadequate bowel preparation can have multiple negative effects on colonoscopy, including incomplete visualisation of colorectal mucosa, higher miss rate of lesions (22–48%), more procedural difficulties, prolonged operation time, reduced interval time, and increased cost of colonoscopy.[1,2] Establishing a threshold of bowel prepa­ ration, below which colonoscopies should be repeated, could have important effects on patient outcomes, such as detecting colorectal cancer.[3]poor correlation between bowel preparation assessment and lesion detection has been reported in many studies.[4,5,6] The National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme included 36 460 colonoscopies for quality analysis and found no correlation between adenoma detection rate (ADR) and bowel preparation.[7]. Since the adenoma detection rate was almost no different between adequate

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call