Abstract

Forest understory vegetation is influenced by broad‐scale variation in climate, intermediate‐scale variation in topography, disturbance and neighborhood interactions. However, little is known about how these multi‐scale controls interact to influence observed spatial patterns. We examined relationships between the aggregated cover of understory plant species (%CU) and multi‐scale controls using a large‐scale experiment including treatments of low (LS), moderate (MS) and variable (VS) disturbance severity replicated in second‐growth Douglas‐fir (Pseudotsuga meziesii)–western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla) forests spanning climate and topographic gradients. We developed hierarchical models using a multi‐step selection process, assessing changes residual spatial autocorrelation associated with progressively broader spatial scales of influence and interaction. To examine the role of plant traits in mediating multi‐scale controls, we contrasted effects for early‐ (%CES) and late‐seral (%CLS) species cover.At neighborhood scales, decreases in %CU with overstory density were accelerated with increases in the relative importance of hemlock in the overstory in the in all but the LS treatment. At intermediate scales, %CU was lower in areas with higher potential radiation in undisturbed control treatments but that trend was reversed in the harvested, disturbed areas. When separated, effects of multi‐scale controls differed between %CES and %CLS. Rates of increases in %CES with reductions in density increased with disturbance severity and decreased with increases in %CLS. At broader scales, %CES increased with climatic moisture deficit where potential radiation was high, and %CLS low. Similarly to %CU, %CLS was related to a three‐way interaction between overstory density, disturbance and hemlock abundance. %CLS declined with increases in climatic moisture deficit where overstory density and the relative abundance of hemlock was high, and decreased with local increases in %CES. Multi‐scale controls explained a portion of the observed spatial autocorrelation for %CES but not %CLS, suggesting the spatial patterning of %CLS is related primarily to unmeasured processes. Results show how understory responses to overstory density and disturbance severity vary across the landscape with moisture and potential radiation, at fine scales with neighborhood structure, and with species traits. Hence, understory responses to climate change likely depend on overstory composition and structure, disturbance and species traits.

Highlights

  • Forest understory vegetation, including all shrub and herbaceous species, exhibits spatial variation in relation to multi-scale controls including site characteristics, forest structural characteristics, disturbance and the traits of individual species (Miller et al 2002, Scheller and Mladenoff 2002, Burton et al 2011)

  • To examine how cross-scale interactions accounted for by fixed effects explain the observed extent of spatial autocorrelation of percent cover within sites, we summarized changes in the range parameter associated with increasing variables from an intercept-only model with random effects only to models of fixed effects selected in steps 1–4

  • Summary and conclusions This study expands our understanding of how factors interact across scales to influence spatial patterns of understory vegetation, improving our ability to predict the consequences of environmental changes over space and time for understory structure and function

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Forest understory vegetation, including all shrub and herbaceous species, exhibits spatial variation in relation to multi-scale controls including site characteristics, forest structural characteristics, disturbance and the traits of individual species (Miller et al 2002, Scheller and Mladenoff 2002, Burton et al 2011). Increases in climatic moisture deficit (i.e., the difference between potential evapotranspiration and precipitation) can decrease overstory productivity (Grier and Running 1977) This lower productivity in turn can lead to higher resource availability for the understory thereby increasing the productivity of understory vegetation (Campbell and Norman 1998, Reich et al 2012, Yelenik et al 2013). The relative abundances of different overstory tree species can influence understory vegetation when there are strong differences in species effects on the local environment and resources (Canham et al 1994, Berger and Puettmann 2000, Burton et al 2011), as well as the density of tree seedlings and saplings (Frelich et al 1998, Keeton and Franklin 2005, Dodson et al 2014). Spatial patterns of ground-layer vegetation tend to be more fine-grained in forests with high densities of saplings in the understory (Miller et al 2002)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call