Abstract

Abstract. Combining multiple data sources with multi-physics simulation frameworks offers new potential to extend snow model inter-comparison efforts to the Himalaya. As such, this study evaluates the sensitivity of simulated regional snow cover and runoff dynamics to different snowpack process representations. The evaluation is based on a spatially distributed version of the Factorial Snowpack Model (FSM) set up for the Astore catchment in the upper Indus basin. The FSM multi-physics model was driven by climate fields from the High Asia Refined Analysis (HAR) dynamical downscaling product. Ensemble performance was evaluated primarily using MODIS remote sensing of snow-covered area, albedo and land surface temperature. In line with previous snow model inter-comparisons, no single FSM configuration performs best in all of the years simulated. However, the results demonstrate that performance variation in this case is at least partly related to inaccuracies in the sequencing of inter-annual variation in HAR climate inputs, not just FSM model limitations. Ensemble spread is dominated by interactions between parameterisations of albedo, snowpack hydrology and atmospheric stability effects on turbulent heat fluxes. The resulting ensemble structure is similar in different years, which leads to systematic divergence in ablation and mass balance at high elevations. While ensemble spread and errors are notably lower when viewed as anomalies, FSM configurations show important differences in their absolute sensitivity to climate variation. Comparison with observations suggests that a subset of the ensemble should be retained for climate change projections, namely those members including prognostic albedo and liquid water retention, refreezing and drainage processes.

Highlights

  • Snow plays a profound role in the climate system and supports water resources in many regions (Barnett et al, 2005; Hall and Qu, 2006)

  • The analysis focuses primarily on snow-covered area (SCA) corresponding with a normalised difference snow index (NDSI) threshold of zero

  • The remaining two combinations of albedo and liquid water representations result in similar cumulative runoff curves, especially early in the season. This indicates that a propensity for earlier, more rapid runoff when applying diagnostic albedo is offset by a delaying effect of the liquid water parameterisation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Snow plays a profound role in the climate system and supports water resources in many regions (Barnett et al, 2005; Hall and Qu, 2006). Given the number of snow models in existence (e.g. Essery et al, 2013), understanding the relative skill of different models and their suitability for various uses is essential This is reflected by the succession of snow model inter-comparison initiatives over recent decades (Essery et al, 2009; Etchevers et al, 2004; Krinner et al, 2018; Slater et al, 2001). Deriving consistent, multivariate climate input fields in largely unobserved and highly variable mountain environments is a long-standing problem (Klemeš, 1990; Raleigh et al, 2015, 2016). In part this explains the proliferation of simple snow modelling in the region, namely through (sometimes enhanced) temperature index methods There are a small but growing number of offline process-based, energy balance model applications

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call