Multi-omic profiling reveals potential biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis and therapy response among mitochondria-associated cell death genes in the context of 3P medicine.

Abstract

Cancer cell growth, metastasis, and drug resistance are major challenges in treating liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC). However, the lack of comprehensive and reliable models hamper the effectiveness of the predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM/3PM) strategy in managing LIHC. Leveraging seven distinct patterns of mitochondrial cell death (MCD), we conducted a multi-omic screening of MCD-related genes. A novel machine learning framework was developed, integrating 10 machine learning algorithms with 67 different combinations to establish a consensus mitochondrial cell death index (MCDI). This index underwent rigorous evaluation across training, validation, and in-house clinical cohorts. A comprehensive multi-omics analysis encompassing bulk, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics was employed to achieve a deeper insight into the constructed signature. The response of risk subgroups to immunotherapy and targeted therapy was evaluated and validated. RT-qPCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemical staining were utilized for findings validation. Nine critical differentially expressed MCD-related genes were identified in LIHC. A consensus MCDI was constructed based on a 67-combination machine learning computational framework, demonstrating outstanding performance in predicting prognosis and clinical translation. MCDI correlated with immune infiltration, Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) score and sorafenib sensitivity. Findings were validated experimentally. Moreover, we identified PAK1IP1 as the most important gene for predicting LIHC prognosis and validated its potential as an indicator of prognosis and sorafenib response in our in-house clinical cohorts. This study developed a novel predictive model for LIHC, namely MCDI. Incorporating MCDI into the PPPM framework will enhance clinical decision-making processes and optimize individualized treatment strategies for LIHC patients. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13167-024-00362-8.