Abstract

Porous scaffolds have recently attracted attention in bone tissue engineering. The implanted scaffolds are supposed to satisfy the mechanical and biological requirements. In this study, two porous structures named MFCC-1 (modified face centered cubic-1) and MFCC-2 (modified face centered cubic-2) are introduced. The proposed porous architectures are evaluated, optimized, and tested to enhance mechanical and biological properties. The geometric parameters of the scaffolds with porosities ranging from 70% to 90% are optimized to find a compromise between the effective Young's modulus and permeability, as well as satisfying the pore size and specific surface area requirements. To optimize the effective Young's modulus and permeability, we integrated a mathematical formulation, finite element analysis, and computational fluid dynamics simulations. For validation, the optimized scaffolds were 3D-printed, tested, and compared with two different orthogonal cylindrical struts (OCS) scaffold architectures. The MFCC designs are preferred to the generic OCS scaffolds from various perspectives: a) the MFCC architecture allows scaffold designs with porosities up to 96%; b) the very porous architecture of MFCC scaffolds allows achieving high permeabilities, which could potentially improve the cell diffusion; c) despite having a higher porosity compared to the OCS scaffolds, MFCC scaffolds improve mechanical performance regarding Young's modulus, stress concentration, and apparent yield strength; d) the proposed structures with different porosities are able to cover all the range of permeability for the human trabecular bones. The optimized MFCC designs have simple architectures and can be easily fabricated and used to improve the quality of load-bearing orthopedic scaffolds. Statement of significancePorous scaffolds are increasingly being studied to repair large bone defects. A scaffold is supposed to withstand mechanical loads and provide an appropriate environment for bone cell growth after implantation. These mechanical and biological requirements are usually contradicting; improving the mechanical performance would require a reduction in porosity and a lower porosity is likely to reduce the biological performance of the scaffold. Various studies have shown that the mechanical and biological performance of bone scaffolds can be improved by internal architecture modification. In this study, we propose two scaffold architectures named MFCC-1 and MFCC-2 and provide an optimization framework to simultaneously optimize their stiffness and permeability to improve their mechanical and biological performances.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call