Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of nanoparticle-borne drugs targeting tumors depends critically on nanoparticle design. Empirical approaches to evaluate such designs in order to maximize treatment efficacy are time- and cost-intensive. We have recently proposed the use of computational modeling of nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery targeting tumor vasculature coupled with numerical optimization to pursue optimal nanoparticle targeting and tumor uptake. Here, we build upon these studies to evaluate the effect of tumor size on optimal nanoparticle design by considering a cohort of heterogeneously-sized tumor lesions, as would be clinically expected. The results indicate that smaller nanoparticles yield higher tumor targeting and lesion regression for larger-sized tumors. We then augment the nanoparticle design optimization problem by considering drug diffusivity, which yields a two-fold tumor size decrease compared to optimizing nanoparticles without this consideration. We quantify the tradeoff between tumor targeting and size decrease using bi-objective optimization, and generate five Pareto-optimal nanoparticle designs. The results provide a spectrum of treatment outcomes – considering tumor targeting vs. antitumor effect – with the goal to enable therapy customization based on clinical need. This approach could be extended to other nanoparticle-based cancer therapies, and support the development of personalized nanomedicine in the longer term.

Highlights

  • The pharmacokinetics of nanoparticle-borne drugs targeting tumors depends critically on nanoparticle design

  • We extend our previous work on numerical optimization of nanoparticles for cancer nanotherapy to generate Pareto-optimal, tumor size-specific nanoparticle designs

  • A preclinical computational study based on numerical optimization is presented to establish a methodology to determine optimal nanotherapy parameters

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The pharmacokinetics of nanoparticle-borne drugs targeting tumors depends critically on nanoparticle design. We build upon these studies to evaluate the effect of tumor size on optimal nanoparticle design by considering a cohort of heterogeneously-sized tumor lesions, as would be clinically expected. The results provide a spectrum of treatment outcomes – considering tumor targeting vs antitumor effect – with the goal to enable therapy customization based on clinical need. This approach could be extended to other nanoparticle-based cancer therapies, and support the development of personalized nanomedicine in the longer term. Nanoparticle margination[6] and adhesion to tumor vasculature[5] have been modeled as a function of nanoparticle properties (size, aspect ratio, ligand surface density, and ligand-receptor binding affinity). We increase the robustness of the nanoparticle design optimization framework by considering drug properties in the nanoparticle design and the tradeoff between treatment efficacy and toxicity

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.