Abstract

Many researchers have taken advantage of adding shape memory alloy (SMA) wires to base isolators to control displacements and residual deformations. In the literature, different arrangements of SMA wires wrapped around the rubber bearings can be found, as examples, straight, cross and double-cross arrangements. SMA wires with various configurations and radii lead to the different characteristics of the isolator system and thus various shear hysteresis. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of these three SMA wire’s configurations in the seismic retrofitting of a benchmark highway bridge by implementing them in the bridge’s existing lead rubber bearings (LRB). This system is referred to as SMA-LRB isolator. Firstly, because of the crucial influence of the wire’s radius, this parameter is determined using a multi-objective optimization algorithm (non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA)-II). This algorithm simultaneously minimizes the deck acceleration and mid-span displacement. Secondly, the optimized SMA-LRBs are implemented in the highway bridge and nonlinear dynamic analysis is conducted. For the nonlinear response history analysis, two strong ground motion records are selected from the PEER database, by studying the site’s conditions. In addition, ten synthetic ground acceleration time histories are generated. The result illustrates that the double-cross SMA-LRB reduces the maximum and residual displacements more than two other devices; however, it causes the largest base shear force and deck acceleration. Besides, the cross-configuration results in the least displacement reduction and has the least shear force and acceleration. To find SMA-LRB with the best overall performance, a multi-objective decision-making method is utilized and the straight SMA-LRB is recognized as the most effective isolator.

Highlights

  • Bridges play a critical role in transportation networks, and any disruption in their function causes huge direct and indirect economic and life losses

  • Xiang and Alam [22] investigated four different retrofitting devices to improve the seismic performance of an lead rubber bearings (LRB)-isolated bridge, namely yielding steel cables (YSCs), viscous dampers (VDs), friction dampers (FDs), and super-elastic shape memory alloy cables (SMAs)

  • Was verified in a previous study [23]. This algorithm calculates the force applied by the SMA wire to εSMA =

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Bridges play a critical role in transportation networks, and any disruption in their function causes huge direct and indirect economic and life losses. Hedayati Dezfuli and Alam [16] numerically investigated two different configurations of SMA wires in conjunction with elastomeric bearings They studied the effects of various parameters such as shear strain amplitude, SMA type, dimension ratio of the base isolation, and the level of pre-strain of the SMA wires on the seismic behavior of base isolators. According to their results, the wire diameters should be selected based on the lateral stiffness and equivalent viscous damping to achieve the high performances. Xiang and Alam [22] investigated four different retrofitting devices to improve the seismic performance of an LRB-isolated bridge, namely yielding steel cables (YSCs), viscous dampers (VDs), friction dampers (FDs), and super-elastic shape memory alloy cables (SMAs). A further contribution of this research is that instead of selecting ground motions from places other than the bridge’s site and modifying them considerably, strong motion records that match the site conditions are carefully picked out and ten synthetic ground acceleration time histories are generated to be used in the nonlinear response history analysis

Benchmark Highway Bridge
Structural
Earthquake Excitations
Ground Motion Time Histories
Basic features two selected records from the PEER
The Hysteresis Model of the LRBs
The Hysteresis Model of SMA Wires
SMA-LRB with Double-Cross Wires
SMA-LRB with Straight Wires
SMA-LRB with Cross Wires
Efficiency of Different Wire Configurations
Force–Displacement Curves
Optimizing the SMA-LRBs
Numerical Analysis
Base Shear
Mid-Span
Mid-Span Displacement
Residual Mid-Span Displacement
Comparing the Three SMA-LRBs
Comparing the Three
Findings
Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.