Abstract

In the 2011 decision Multi-Link Leisure Developments Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council, the United Kingdom Supreme Court purported to apply a business common sense approach to the interpretation of an option clause in a lease. In particular, several of the Lords identified that the one possible interpretation of the clause would lead to a "windfall" – a significant financial advantage – for the appellant. Their reasons hinged significantly on their view that this was a consequence inconsistent with commercial sense, which the parties were unlikely to have intended. This article analyses the relevance of a "windfall" in the context of the modern common sense approach to the construction of contracts. It concludes that the Court’s reliance upon a "windfall" of this kind goes beyond the bounds of commercial interpretation and introduces problematic notions of substantive fairness into a business common sense approach to the interpretation of contracts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call