Multi-Jurisdictional Evaluation of Sentinel City Virtual Simulation for Community Health Nursing Clinical Education

Abstract

Although positive learning outcomes have been documented for nursing students who participate in virtual simulation for community health nursing clinical education (Chircop & Cobbett, 2020), it is unknown whether learning outcomes of students using the same virtual simulation program are comparable across jurisdictions. Nine schools of nursing across Canada (Nova Scotia, Ontario, British Columbia) implemented and evaluated Sentinel City a virtual simulation program to complement the traditional community clinical, or as an alternative learning experience. A descriptive survey was used to carry out an evaluation of the use of Sentinel City and student learning outcomes. Quantitative data provided demographic statistics to describe the sample, compare student learning outcomes and perceptions of their learning experience and the qualitative data from open-ended questions provided detailed responses on the use of Sentinel City and its future recommendation. Data were analyzed using ANOVA (Welch statistic) to identify any significant differences among students from each jurisdiction in relation to their perception of the use of Sentinel City in meeting their course learning outcomes. Qualitative data from open-ended responses were analyzed using the six-step process outlined by Braun and Clarke (2006). The use of Sentinel City for community clinical learning in various Canadian jurisdictions positively contributed to achieving desired student learning outcomes. There are, however, significant differences among jurisdictions. Most of the students “agreed” that Sentinel City helped them achieve course learning outcomes. In all jurisdictions, most of the students indicated that they were “confident” and “very confident” in their knowledge about the community health nursing process, understanding of a population/community health assessment, understanding how to plan a population health intervention, and in their ability to integrate the five principles of primary health care into practice. Regarding their ability to apply a population health perspective (upstream thinking), most of the students were “confident” and “very confident”. Almost all students (93.62%) were confident and “very confident” in their ability to recognize health inequities indicating the highest level of confidence (Mean 4.38, SD 0.71). As educators, we found several advantages with the use of SC, including the ability to create controlled and standardized clinical learning experiences which contributes to fairness and quality of community clinical education. We recommend a robust orientation and professional development program for clinical instructors in community health nursing that is consistent with the new International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (2021) standards. The required expertise in community health nursing together with solid