Abstract

BackgroundPrecision Livestock Farming (PLF) is a promising approach to minimize the conflicts between socio-economic activities and landscape conservation. However, its application on extensive systems of livestock production can be challenging. The main difficulties arise because animals graze on large natural pastures where they are exposed to competition with wild herbivores for heterogeneous and scarce resources, predation risk, adverse weather, and complex topography. Considering that the 91% of the world’s surface devoted to livestock production is composed of extensive systems (i.e., rangelands), our general aim was to develop a PLF methodology that quantifies: (i) detailed behavioural patterns, (ii) feeding rate, and (iii) costs associated with different behaviours and landscape traits.MethodsFor this, we used Merino sheep in Patagonian rangelands as a case study. We combined data from an animal-attached multi-sensor tag (tri-axial acceleration, tri-axial magnetometry, temperature sensor and Global Positioning System) with landscape layers from a Geographical Information System to acquire data. Then, we used high accuracy decision trees, dead reckoning methods and spatial data processing techniques to show how this combination of tools could be used to assess energy balance, predation risk and competition experienced by livestock through time and space.ResultsThe combination of methods proposed here are a useful tool to assess livestock behaviour and the different factors that influence extensive livestock production, such as topography, environmental temperature, predation risk and competition for heterogeneous resources. We were able to quantify feeding rate continuously through time and space with high accuracy and show how it could be used to estimate animal production and the intensity of grazing on the landscape. We also assessed the effects of resource heterogeneity (inferred through search times), and the potential costs associated with predation risk, competition, thermoregulation and movement on complex topography.DiscussionThe quantification of feeding rate and behavioural costs provided by our approach could be used to estimate energy balance and to predict individual growth, survival and reproduction. Finally, we discussed how the information provided by this combination of methods can be used to develop wildlife-friendly strategies that also maximize animal welfare, quality and environmental sustainability.

Highlights

  • The use of natural grasslands for livestock production epitomizes conflicts of interests between landscape conservation and socio-economic activities (Saberwal, 1996; Baldi, Albon & Elston, 2001; Treves & Karanth, 2003), and gathering precise data for quantification of costs and benefits for both parties is challenging

  • A solution may lie in precision livestock farming (PLF), which has been proposed as a new and promising approach that allows animal welfare and economic productivity to be balanced with landscape conservation (e.g., Berckmans, 2014; Kokin et al, 2007)

  • There is a strong consensus about the conditions that need to be met for a method to be considered as Precision Livestock Farming (PLF) tool: (1) it should allow different animal traits to be measured continuously and with high resolution, such as weight, activity, behaviour, and feeding rate, among others; (2) all measures and outcomes should have high precision and accuracy to allow robust predictions about how animals will respond to different scenarios where the main processes affecting livestock production change; and (3) the measures can be processed through general algorithms that should be available and extended to other systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The use of natural grasslands for livestock production epitomizes conflicts of interests between landscape conservation and socio-economic activities (Saberwal, 1996; Baldi, Albon & Elston, 2001; Treves & Karanth, 2003), and gathering precise data for quantification of costs and benefits for both parties is challenging. If the information is gathered through time, and through space (i.e., spatially explicit), PLF tools provide data that could be used to assess and minimize the impact of livestock on the landscape (Misselbrook et al, 2016), thereby maintaining livestock productivity (e.g., Umstatter, Waterhouse & Holland, 2008; Umstatter, 2011). The combination of methods proposed here are a useful tool to assess livestock behaviour and the different factors that influence extensive livestock production, such as topography, environmental temperature, predation risk and competition for heterogeneous resources. We discussed how the information provided by this combination of methods can be used to develop wildlife-friendly strategies that maximize animal welfare, quality and environmental sustainability

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call