Multi-dimensional assessment of long-term outcomes in patients treated with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation during refractory cardiac arrest

Abstract

Abstract Background Recent randomised controlled trials showed short-term survival benefits with extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) compared to standard cardiac arrest treatment in selected patients with refractory cardiac arrest. Only limited data exist on multi-dimensional long-term outcomes after ECPR. Purpose To investigate multi-dimensional long-term outcomes of ECPR survivors, that is general health status, as well as cardiac, cognitive and psychological functions. Methods This is a multicenter, mixed-method clinical study conducted by cardiologists, neurologists and psychologists between May 2021 and December 2023. Adult patients who survived ECPR with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) or "ECMELLA" (i.e., VA-ECMO plus percutaneous left-ventricular assist device) in two German tertiary care centers were included. A comprehensive set of functional outcomes across multiple dimensions were assessed at approximately 18 months after the index cardiac arrest event (see Figure for stations A to E and explanation of abbreviations). Results Long-term outcomes were assessed in 32 ECPR survivors, out of whom 15 patients (46%) had received VA-ECMO and 18 (54%) ECMELLA treatment. 23 patients (70%) were male and the average age was 55 years (±13). Vital signs and laboratory markers were unremarkable. Most patients denied heart failure symptoms although the average EQ-5D-5L score was 52 (±8). The left-ventricular ejection fraction was 51% (±9), which improved by 14% (±11) in the ECMO group and 31% (±15) in the ECMELLA group since the index cardiac arrest event. Bicycle exercise (on average 6 minutes duration with a power of up to 100 Watts) and 6-minute walk test (average distance of 394 meters ±145) revealed physical impairments. 29 patients (88%) had a good cerebral performance (i.e., Cerebral Performance Category scale of 1) and the average mental status was good (mini–mental state examination score 29 ±1). 22 patients (56%) perceived (partial) impairments in activities of daily living although the average Barthel index was 100 (±5) and modified Rankin scale was 1 (±1). 12 patients (36%) were unable to return to their jobs. Remarkably, 17 (51%) and 4 (12%) patients reported depressive symptoms and suicidal thoughts, respectively. Conclusion Although ECPR remains a highly complex procedure, cardiac and neurologic functions in survivors have almost recovered, while physical and psychological impairments still persisted at 18 months after cardiac arrest. Physical rehabilitation and psychological care appear to be important measures for ECPR survivors.