Abstract

This paper presents results of a study that focuses on developing a genetic algorithm (GA) for multi-criteria optimization of orthotropic, energy-efficient cementitious composite sandwich panels (CSP). The current design concept of all commercially produced CSP systems is based on the assumption that such panels are treated as doubly reinforced sections without the consideration of the three-dimensional truss contribution of the orthotropic panel system. This leads to uneconomical design and underestimating both the strength and stiffness of such system. In this study, two of the most common types of commercially produced sandwich were evaluated both numerically and experimentally and results were used as basis for developing a genetic algorithm optimization process using numerical modeling simulations. In order to develop a sandwich panel with high structural performance, design optimization techniques are needed to achieve higher composite action, while maintaining the favorable features of such panels such as lightweight and high thermal insulation. The study involves both linear and nonlinear finite element analyses and parametric optimization. The verification and calibration of the numerical models is based on full-scale experimental results that were performed on two types of commercially produced sandwich panels under different loading scenarios. The genetic algorithm technique is used for optimization to identify an optimum design of the cementitious composite sandwich panels. The GA technique combines Darwin’s principle of survival of fittest and a structured information exchange using randomized crossover operators to evolve an optimum design for the cementitious sandwich panel. Parameters evaluated in the study include: (i) shear connectors’ geometry, its volume fraction and distribution; (ii) exterior cementitious face sheets thickness and (iii) size and geometry steel wires reinforcements. The proposed optimization method succeeded in reducing cost of materials of CSP by about 48% using genetic algorithm methodology. In addition, an optimized design for CSP is proposed that resulted in increasing the panel’s thermal resistance by 40% as compared to existing panels, while meeting ACI Code structural design criteria. Pareto-optimal front and Pareto-optimal solutions have been identified. Correlation between the design variables is also verified and design recommendation are proposed.

Highlights

  • The verification and calibration of the numerical models is based on full-scale experimental results that were performed on two types of commercially produced sandwich panels under different loading scenarios

  • The genetic algorithm (GA) technique combines Darwin’s principle of survival of fittest and a structured information exchange using randomized crossover operators to evolve an optimum design for the cementitious sandwich panel

  • A symmetric boundary condition for geometric design for the Cementitious sandwich panel (CSP) is selected in this paper to evaluate sensitivity reinforcement design, which has a high effect on both cost and thermal insulation of the CSP which are the target of this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In response to the increasing global awareness of the energy consumption and environmental impact, engineers and the construction industry are facing great challenges in developing energy-efficient and environmentally compatible civil infrastructures systems. Cementitious sandwich panel (CSP) construction system is an example of an alternative sustainable building technology that satisfies such major challenges. Compared to traditional reinforced concrete, CSP can meet all design demands with its modular design, efficient use of cementitious materials, lightweight, superior flexural strength and thermal and acoustics insulation capabilities. Sandwich construction has been widely used by different industries in both structural and non-structural applications such as packaging and protective materials [1]. Aerospace grade of sandwich panels is typically manufactured using relatively expensive materials such as graphite/epoxy composite face sheets and high-performance aluminum or composite honeycomb core materials

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call