Abstract

To carry out all virtual or online activities, you need hardware that can support it, one of which is a webcam. Many webcam products issued by various electronics companies are compatible for laptops and computers. However, to make a webcam selection the user must know one by one the specifications of each webcam. This of course takes a long time to determine the right webcam. This study aims to implement the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach with Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) on a webcam selection decision support system, in order to get the best, right and fast alternative. The WASPAS method can determine the best alternative through prioritization that is relevant to the weighting used. Based on the case studies conducted, the WASPAS method was able to determine the best webcam with the best alternative results, namely NYK Nemesis A96 with a value of 0.7053, followed by Aukey PC-LM7 with a value of 0.6826, JETE W2 with a value of 0.6799, Logitech C922 with a value of 0.6499 and Ausdom AF660 with a value 0.6271. Because the findings are identical to manual calculations, the created system generates legitimate WASPAS method calculations. Based on the tests carried out using the black-box testing approach, it shows that all the functions in the system can run as they should

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.