Abstract

Due to environmental and economic drawbacks of fossil fuels, global renewable energy (RE) capacity has increased significantly over the last decade. Solar photovoltaic (PV) is one of the fastest-growing RE technologies. Selecting an appropriate site is one of the most critical steps in utility-scale solar PV planning. This paper aims at proposing a rational multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach based on the Brown–Gibson model for optimal site selection for utility-scale solar PV projects. The proposed model considers the project’s net present value (NPV) along with seven suitability factors and six critical (constraint) factors. The RETScreen software was applied in calculating the NPV, the simple payback period and the carbon emission savings of the project at each alternative site. The weights of the suitability factors were determined using the analytical hierarchy process. Applied to the case study of finding the best location for a 5 MW solar PV project in northern Cameroon, the optimization results showed that Mokolo was the optimal location. The sensitivity analysis results revealed that the rankings of alternative sites based on the project’s NPV and the proposed model are not consistent. Compared to the traditional MCDM approaches, the proposed model provides decision-makers with a more practical thinking method in the optimal location process of utility-scale solar projects.

Highlights

  • Energy, especially electricity, has long been recognized as an essential commodity for everyday life in the contemporary world [1]

  • Factor measure (OFM)) of objective each location. These results show that location measure has a coefficient of variation much higher than that of the net present value (NPV) calculated by RETScreen,Location meaning that it allows forRank better differentiation of the alternative

  • 0.55 appropriate value of α belongs to the interval [0.3–0.7] [52]. These results show that location measure has a coefficient of variation much higher than that of the NPV calculated by RETScreen, meaning that it allows for better differentiation of the alternative sites

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Especially electricity, has long been recognized as an essential commodity for everyday life in the contemporary world [1]. 65% [2] as illustrated in Figure 1 of the 2017 global electricity generation mix Due to their non-renewable nature, these sources are not likely to satisfy the increasing world demand in electricity resulting from the permanent growth in the world’s population and technological advancement. A study by Abas et al [3] showed that oil, natural gas, and coal would be depleted in 2066, 2068, and 2126, respectively This situation is the primary cause of the current price volatility and energy supply insecurity. The consequences of climate change are far and varied, and include increased wildfires, prolonged droughts, stronger tropical storms, and frequent coastal floods [4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call