Abstract

Aggressive invasions by species such as para grass Urochloa mutica (Forssk.) are pervasive throughout the tropics, but the impacts on estuarine habitats and biota are poorly understood. After weed control was reduced in a tropical estuary, U. mutica reinvaded this area composed of two contiguous habitats: a shallow pond and a deeper river. These habitats are especially important for Mugil cephalus, a culturally prized native mullet, and introduced Moolgarda engeli not targeted in the fishery. We investigated the potential impacts of U. mutica on juvenile and adult mullets by comparing the catch per unit effort (CPUE) of the two mullet species and the physiochemical measurements from the two contiguous habitats during different stages of its reinvasion. Overall, negative effects on the CPUE of M. cephalus and M. engeli were found as a result of the U. mutica reinvasion. The M. cephalus CPUE was consistently higher in the shallow pond habitat compared to the deeper river habitat. It decreased after U. mutica was established, correlative to the invasive grass canopies smothering the shallow habitat favored by juveniles. The M. engeli CPUE significantly declined during the initial periods of U. mutica reinvasion, but did not decline further after the grass became established. No differences in the M. engeli CPUE between habitats were found, indicating that M. engeli are habitat generalists. These findings are among the first in an insular tropical estuary demonstrating a negative relationship between an invasive grass and relative abundances of two confamiliar fish, while revealing distinct patterns attributed to species-specific traits. Importantly, the broad overlapping biogeographic distribution of M. cephalus and U. mutica, and the negative relationship between these species, raises widespread concern for this mullet as a globally important fisheries species.

Highlights

  • IntroductionCoastal and inland fish interact with aquatic plants, especially habitat-forming plant species

  • Coastal and inland fish interact with aquatic plants, especially habitat-forming plant species.Vegetated habitats, overall, have been shown to support higher densities of fish than open habitats, because aquatic plants provide ecological services that benefit fish, and the productivity of fisheries [1,2,3]

  • We demonstrated that while the relative abundances of M. cephalus and M. engeli decreased with the unconstrained spread of U. mutica in an insular tropical estuary, the two mullet species displayed distinct patterns with the reinvasion

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Coastal and inland fish interact with aquatic plants, especially habitat-forming plant species. Overall, have been shown to support higher densities of fish than open habitats, because aquatic plants provide ecological services that benefit fish, and the productivity of fisheries [1,2,3]. Fishes 2017, 2, 7 in cases where the aquatic plant is an exotic species, challenges arise for the conservation of biological diversity, environmental policy, and fisheries management. After native vegetation is outcompeted, it is critical to understand whether the invasive plant provides ecological services that benefit fish populations in the recipient communities or whether the systems are degraded by the introduced aquatic plant

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.