Abstract

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Although existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Herein, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole.Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, positive-controlled, double-blinded, parallel-group phase II clinical trial, a total of 150 qualified patients with endoscopically confirmed active duodenal ulcers were randomized (1:1:1) to receive rabeprazole 10 mg, anaprazole 20 mg or anaprazole 40 mg for 4 weeks. The ulcer healing rates after 4 weeks of treatment were compared between groups by independent central review and investigator review. In addition, symptoms and safety were evaluated.Results: Based on the independent central review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 88.0, 85.1, and 87.5%, respectively, in the FAS population and 88.9, 86.0, and 90.9%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9% (95% CI, −16.5–10.7%), and −0.5% (95% CI, −13.5–12.5%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Based on the investigator review, the ulcer healing rates of the 10 mg rabeprazole, 20 mg anaprazole, and 40 mg anaprazole groups were 72.0, 70.2, and 77.1%, respectively, in the FAS population and 75.6, 72.1, and 79.5%, respectively, in the PPS population. The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8% (95% CI, −19.8–16.3%), and 5.1% (95% CI, −12.2–22.3%) between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population. Most patients (>90%) eventually achieved complete symptom relief. The incidence rates of adverse events were of no significant differences among the treatment groups. Potential possible better liver tolerance was observed in two anaprazole dose groups than rabeprazole 10 mg group.Conclusion: Both at a dosage of 20 and 40 mg daily, anaprazole, is effective with good safety profile in the treatment of active duodenal ulcers in this Phase 2 study, which allows anaprazole to be advanced to a phase III clinical trial.Clinical Trial Registration: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT04503629&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=, Identifier: CTR20181464, NCT04503629.

Highlights

  • Duodenal ulcer (DU) is a common acid-related gastrointestinal disorder that has a high incidence in clinical practice in China

  • The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −2.9%, and −0.5% between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the full analysis set (FAS) population

  • The ulcer healing rate difference between anaprazole 20 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg is −1.8%, and 5.1% between anaprazole 40 mg and Rabeprazole 10 mg, in the FAS population

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Duodenal ulcer (DU) is a common acid-related gastrointestinal disorder that has a high incidence in clinical practice in China. Comparative studies have demonstrated that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can provide better improvement of acid suppression, ulcer healing and pain relief than histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) [1]. Previous preclinical trials showed that rabeprazole, a commonly used PPI in DU patients that has shown great curative efficacy in terms of promoting ulcer healing and clinical symptom relief, is superior to other PPIs, such as omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, in the inhibition of H+/K+ATPase [2–4]. Existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, there are clinical needs for PPIs with better safety profile in case of various adverse reaction of PPIs. Many scientists are devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are validated gastric acid suppressors and have been widely used to treat patients with active duodenal ulcers. Existing PPIs have shown great efficacy, many scientists are still devoted to developing more effective PPIs with better safety profile. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of anaprazole in duodenal mucosal healing, a novel PPI, to that of rabeprazole

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.