Abstract

Purpose. Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are group of inherited lysosomal storage diseases caused by mutations of enzymes involved in catalyzing different glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). MPS I and MPS II exhibit both somatic and neurological symptoms with a relatively high disease incidence. Hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT) and intravenous enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) have had a significant impact on the treatment and comprehension of disease. This review is aimed at providing a comprehensive evaluation of the pros and cons of HSCT and ERT, as well as an up-to-date knowledge of new drugs under development. In addition, multiple disease management strategies for the uncontrollable manifestations of MPS I and MPS II to improve patients' quality of life are presented. Findings. Natural history of MPS I and MPS II shows that somatic and neurological symptoms occur earlier in severe forms of MPS I than in MPS II. ERT increases life expectancy and alleviates some of the somatic symptoms, but musculoskeletal, ophthalmological, and central nervous system (CNS) manifestations are not controlled. Additionally, life-long treatment burdens and immunogenicity restriction are unintended consequences of ERT application. HSCT, another treatment method, is effective in controlling the CNS symptoms and hence has been adopted as the standard treatment for severe types of MPS I. However, it is ineffective in MPS II, which can be explained by the relatively late diagnosis. In addition, several factors such as transplant age limits or graft-versus-host disease in HSCT have limited its application for patients. Novel therapies, including BBB-penetrable-ERT, gene therapy, and substrate reduction therapy, are under development to control currently unmanageable manifestations. BBB-penetrable-ERT is being studied comprehensively in the hopes of being used in the near future as a method to effectively control CNS symptoms. Gene therapy has the potential to “cure” the disease with a one-time treatment rather than just alleviate symptoms, which makes it an attractive treatment strategy. Several clinical studies on gene therapy reveal that delivering genes directly into the brain achieves better results than intravenous administration in patients with neurological symptoms. Considering new drugs are still in clinical stage, disease management with close monitoring and supportive/palliative therapy is of great importance for the time being. Proper rehabilitation therapy, including physical and occupational therapy, surgical intervention, or medications, can benefit patients with uncontrolled musculoskeletal, respiratory, ophthalmological, and neurological manifestations.

Highlights

  • Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare, heterogeneous group of lysosomal storage disorders caused by a deficiency of various catalyzing enzymes that break down polysaccharides, called glycosaminoglycans (GAGs)

  • MPS I has been classified into three phenotypes: Hurler syndrome, Hurler-Scheie syndrome, and Scheie syndrome

  • While enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) or Hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT) improves the life expectancy in children with MPS, in most cases, their efficacy comes into question because still struggled a long time with performing daily activities and significantly reduced walking duration [108]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare, heterogeneous group of lysosomal storage disorders caused by a deficiency of various catalyzing enzymes that break down polysaccharides, called glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). GAGs are ubiquitously present in the connective tissue and play important roles in cell growth and proliferation, cell surface binding, and histamine storage [1,2,3,4,5,6]. After Charles Hunter and Gertrud Hurler first reported MPS in patients in 1917 and 1919, with the metabolic disorders bearing their names (MPS I: Hurler syndrome, MPS II: Hunter syndrome), subsequent MPS types have been assigned numbers and eponyms loosely associated with the chronology and origin of their report [8]. Eleven enzymatic deficits are known to be responsible for seven different types

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call