Abstract
Despite being considered the ''gold standard'' for the treatment of severe male postprostatectomy incontinence, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) is not incorporated and provided in the Brazilian public health system. The objective of the presented study was to evaluate the cost-utility of AUS in this perspective.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
